Xinhua News Agency, Beijing, July 16th. Question: "Risk -de -risk" is difficult to hide the nature of China -one of the reviews of the "de -risk" words trap series of comments
Xinhua News Agency reporter Gao Wencheng
On the issue of relations with China, US senior officials have recently stated many times that they do not seek confrontation, cold war or "decoupling" in China.It is only a caliber, and what is unchanged is the "risk" label to China economic and trade activities, promote the "de -China" supply chain supply chain of key industrial chain, and create a "small courtyard wall" that destroys normal Chinese and foreign technology exchanges…. What is this not "decourse"?In the name of "de -risk", it is the true plan behind the "decoustal" of China to "decoupling" China, and continuing to curb isolation China.
Risk is inherent in all economic activities, and preventing risks is not new.After encountering the new crown epidemic, Ukraine crisis and other incidents, some countries have advocated strengthening the construction of the industrial chain, enhancing the toughness of the supply chain, and proposing "differentiation risks".Reasonable security concerns can be understood, but the United States uses this mentality to generally generally security risks, sell security anxiety, expands the concept of "de -risk", and uses the concept of continuous hype, use, and alienation.Association with China, the intention of painting China with "risk" will simplify the "de -risk" path into "de -Sinicization", so as to replace the strategy of curbing China on a new outfit.The world newspaper Cindica website published an article that the new story of "de -risk" "implies that there are inherent risks in trade with China". China believes that there is no substantial difference between "de -risk" and "decoupling".of.
This is the White House taken in Washington, the capital of the United States on January 20.Xinhua News Agency reporter Liu Jie
The words change, but the purpose behind it has not changed at all.The US President’s National Security Affairs Assistant, Salvin, said that seeking "risks" is not "decoupling", but talked about setting up the so -called "small courtyard wall" strategy in key technical fields.After suffering huge losses and seriously interfere with the stable supply chain of the global industrial chain, the stability of the global industrial chain has caused a large number of criticisms, the purpose of a series of operations in the United States is to eliminate China to eliminate key supply chains.China’s development and growth to maintain its own hegemony monopoly advantage.
Kim Liangji, a professor at the Department of Economic and Financial at Daegu University in South Korea, said that if the deductive language "selective" is added before "decoupling", the substantial difference between the "risk" will disappear.The "South China Morning Post" article said that no matter what kind of use in the United States, the motivation behind it is still hostile to other regions to develop desires and maintain the status of the United States.
In order to "decompose", the United States has played a "four -board ax": sanctioning Chinese companies, expanding the scope of US investment restrictions on China, strengthening trade restrictions on advanced chip technology and other fields, and hindering Sino -US scientific and technological cooperation and exchanges.Although the United States is unwilling to "decide" and "risks", the relevant policies have not been loosened, but they have intensified.Most leader of the US Congress Senate announced in early May that a cross -party proposal called "China Competitive Act 2.0" tried to win "competition" to China by restricting investment and technology flowing to China.On June 12, the US Department of Commerce included 31 Chinese entities in the field of aviation related fields in principle prohibiting exports.The United States not only abuses export control measures, but also does not hesitate to damage his friends to fertilize, coerced to seduce some allies to join the small circle of export restrictions on China.
In addition, in the so -called "Indo -Pacific Region", the "Indo -Pacific Economic Framework" and "Chip Quartet Alliance" are pushed;Among these "small circles", the United States has plugged in many rows of other terms, frequently hyped the so -called China’s "economic coercion", and the abducted allies to seduce La La form a "supply chain alliance" to create a "parallel system" that excludes China outside, the United States and ChinaThe pace of "decoupling" or "selective decoupling" is actually accelerating.
No matter how the wording changes, the United States has not changed in the practice of treating US -China relations with the Cold War thinking. The orientation of the political and technological issues of economic and trade and scientific and technological issues has not changed.In order to maintain its own hegemony, the United States violates the wishes of various countries to promote the "camp", destroy the global industrial chain supply chain, and constitutes a real risk to the world’s prosperity and stability.
On April 26, the audience filmed the "Nine Chapters" optical quantum computing prototype model at the second China (Anhui) scientific and technological innovation achievement transformation trade conference.Photo by Huang Bohan, a reporter from Xinhua News Agency
In fact, the "risk" strategy of the United States has caused widespread alertness.British scholar Niar Ferguson, who works in the United States, wrote that the Europeans questioned the US version of "de -risk". Three reasons: First, they regard the US "Angle Act" as the Bayeon version of "U.S. Priority";The second is that they realize that Sarawon’s "high wall" will also make Europe unable to participate in artificial intelligence competitions; the third is that they are worried that American technology to curb China’s policy will have unexpected consequences.The Carnegie International Institute of Peace in the United States warned: "The technical foundation of the United States is inseparable from China to cover a global technology network. If you cut off and reorganize the network at will, the consequences will be terrible and dangerous."
The reporter Jon Betman believes that if you cut off the technical connection with China, it will hurt the United States itself: First, Apple and other American companies cannot copy the supply chain at similar costs outside China.Technology companies bring great harm; second, the United States needs Chinese technology products and raw materials in some areas, and "decoupling" will cause great difficulties to apply related technologies and manufacture related products in the United States; the third is that "decoupling" will hinder the scientific and technological talents of the two countries that hinder the scientific and technological talents of the two countries.Communication has brought huge challenges to the fields of American scientific research and education.
U.S. Minister of Finance Yellen summarized his visit to China on the 9th that he heard that the Chinese side believed that "de -risk" was equivalent to "decoupling" and said that it was important to solve related issues.In the process of dealing with the United States, China has always listened to its words. I hope that the United States really understands the meaning of the Chinese side and proves that it does not seek to be "decoupled" with China with practical actions.Cognition, change its mistakes to China.
